Back
developer-toolsagentsOpen source

Jev Review

A code-review pipeline assembled from small typed judgments instead of one long reviewer prompt.

What Jev decides

What is risky, which files and evidence matter, what could fail, how severe it is, and who should review it.

Jev Review chains risk checks, file selection, evidence selection, mechanism classification, severity scoring, and reviewer routing, then presents inspectable findings in a local dashboard.

NOULCHOICESCORE
Jev role
Filter review scope, select evidence, score severity, and route candidate findings.
Input
Repository metadata, diffs or files, candidate snippets, and earlier pipeline decisions.
Output
A sequence of Noul probabilities, Choice distributions, and Score results.
Decision frequency
Across multiple stages of one repository review run.
Fallback
Human verification plus normal tests, linters, type checks, and security tools.
Author reported · Source reviewed

How it works

Input
Repository metadata, diffs or files, candidate snippets, and earlier pipeline decisions.
Jev
NOUL + CHOICE + SCORE
Output
A sequence of Noul probabilities, Choice distributions, and Score results.

Reported performance

GitHub stars

409

Repository adoption snapshot

Author reported · Source reviewed

Captured Sep 21, 2026

Overview

Jev Review decomposes repository review into a sequence of Noul, Choice, and Score calls. It first builds a risk matrix, narrows the files and snippets worth inspecting, asks for a failure mechanism and severity, and routes the finding to a suitable reviewer persona.

The README describes the tool as experimental. Findings are leads for a human reviewer, not proof of a bug, and the pipeline does not replace compilers, tests, static analysis, or security scanners.

Language
TypeScript
License
MIT
Author
Dev Agrawal
Sources checked Sep 21, 2026

Sources

Related projects